Skip to main content
Judicial Branch of California branding Judicial Branch of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • Judicial Council
California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
    • All News
    • Chief Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • Courts of Appeal
    • Superior Courts
    • Judicial Council
  • Calendar
  • Multimedia
    • Media Contacts
    • Branch Facts
    • The CARE Act
    • Cameras in the Courtroom
    • Public Records Requests
    • Webcast Information
  • Lyft to pay $272.5M in largest California settlement over worker classification

    San Francisco Chronicle
    October 1, 2026

    Ride-hailing giant Lyft agreed Thursday to pay $272.5 million to settle a lawsuit challenging its classification of drivers in California as contractors, rather than employees entitled to minimum wages, unemployment insurance and other benefits. But the settlement — most of which would be paid to drivers who worked for Lyft between April 2016 and December 2020 — doesn’t require Lyft to treat its current drivers as employees. 

    Related: The Recorder, CalMatters, Reuters, Courthouse News Service, Bloomberg Law, CBS News Sacramento, Law Commentary

  • Newsom Signs First-of-Its-Kind Bill Governing Lawyer AI Use

    Bloomberg Law
    October 1, 2026

    (Subscription required) California has enacted first-in-the-nation legislation to regulate attorneys’ use of generative artificial intelligence tools in their work, banning them from delegating the practice of law to AI and restricting their entry of confidential or personal information into AI tools.

  • Newsom signs major expansion of California antitrust law

    Daily Journal
    October 1, 2026

    (Subscription required) AB 1776 gives state prosecutors new authority to pursue anticompetitive conduct by dominant companies, widening California's divergence from federal antitrust law despite significant concessions to business groups.

    Related: Sacramento Bee, CalMatters

  • 9th Circuit weighs overhaul of decades-old copyright infringement test

    Daily Journal
    September 30, 2026

    (Subscription required) An en banc panel considering photographer Jeffrey Sedlik's copyright case against tattoo artist Kat Von D questioned whether the circuit's longstanding "intrinsic" test is too subjective to permit meaningful appellate review.

Pagination (90 pages of results found)

  • « First
  • ‹‹
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 7 of 90
  • …
  • 90
  • ››
  • Last »

News and Features

  • Chief Justice
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • All News

Resources

  • Calendar
  • Public Records Request
  • Branch Facts

For Media

  • Media Contacts
  • Multimedia
  • Cameras in the Courtroom

Subscribe with your email address to receive news and updates

The email address is not made public. It will only be used if you need to be contacted about your account or for opted-in notifications.
CALIFORNIA COURTS NEWSROOM
Judicial Branch of California branding  for footer Judicial Branch of California
  • Access to Records
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
© 2026