NewsLinks is a collection of recent news items relating primarily to the California judicial branch. NewsLinks does not verify or endorse the accuracy or fairness of the news items, and the views expressed in opinions, editorials, and commentaries are those of the writers only. Some news articles linked from this page may require a subscription or be behind a paywall.

NewsLinks

  • Suspect in Santa Maria Courthouse Bombing Pleads Guilty

    The Recorder
    September 14, 2026

    (Subscription required) A Santa Maria man has agreed to plead guilty to detonating a bomb in a Santa Barbara County courthouse in 2024, according to an agreement with prosecutors filed in the U.S. District Court for California’s Central District. Nathaniel James McGuire will plead guilty to one count of using a weapon of mass destruction and one count of using an explosive for malicious destruction of a building.

  • Rape Victim Rightly Granted Restitution for Lost Scholarship

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    September 15, 2026

    Div. Six of this district’s Court of Appeal held yesterday that a trial judge did not abuse her discretion in awarding the rape victim of an on-campus assault $20,000 in restitution to account for a four-year scholarship she lost after withdrawing from classes at the Camarillo-based California State University Channel Islands in the wake of the attack, rejecting the defendant’s view that a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision operates to require a jury trial on the issue.

  • C.A. Says Allegation That Defendant Blocked Exit Suffices for Pleading False Imprisonment

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    September 15, 2026

    A nurse at a hospital successfully pled a cause of action for false imprisonment based on an allegation that an administrative assistant-secretary who was under her supervision blocked her from exiting her office, even without a specification as to the duration of the detention and the apparent purpose having been to prevent a third party from leaving, the Sixth District Court of Appeal has held.

  • C.A. Reinstates Suit Against Rabbi Accused of Tearing Up Signs of Would-Be Protester

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    September 15, 2026

    The Court of Appeal for this district has reinstated an action against a rabbi who allegedly tore up signs a woman planned to use in protesting the conducting of “Kapparot,” an Orthodox Jewish ritual that includes the slaughtering of a chicken. Justice John L. Segal of Div. Seven authored the unpublished opinion, filed Friday. 

  • Litigant Had No Standing to Seek Ouster of Rival’s Lawyer

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    September 14, 2026

    The defendant in an action against it by a former employee who alleges fraud and unfair business practices had no standing to move for the disqualification of the plaintiff’s lawyer on the ground that, as a deputy Los Angeles alternate public defender, he was impermissibly representing a private client, Div. Five of this district’s Court of Appeal has declared.

  • Judicial Profile: Los Angeles County Judge Dean Hansell

    Daily Journal
    September 14, 2026

    (Subscription required) Judge Dean Hansell expected family law to be a brief stop before moving to civil. A decade later, the complex financial cases, thorny legal questions, and human stakes have convinced him he has "one of the best jobs" on the Los Angeles County bench. 

  • Federal appeals court steers San Diego insurance dispute to California Supreme Court

    San Diego Union-Tribune
    September 12, 2026

    A federal appeals court has taken the unusual step of steering a class-action case to the California Supreme Court, saying the state high court is best suited to resolve the dispute. The case involves past and current members of the U.S. armed services who were allegedly charged higher insurance rates than military officers by USAA, the high-profile insurer that caters to active service members and veterans.

  • In purple California, lawmaker sisters take on their MAGA sheriff

    San Francisco Chronicle
    September 12, 2026

    Clarissa Cervantes has top billing in Cervantes et al. v. Bianco, one of two California Supreme Court cases challenging the legality of Bianco’s Prop 50 investigation. As the Trump administration challenges states’ authority to run their own elections, the Cervantes-Bianco rivalry has eclipsed the borders of the purple county that elected all three and become a broader fight over California’s political future.