NewsLinks is a collection of recent news items relating primarily to the California judicial branch. NewsLinks does not verify or endorse the accuracy or fairness of the news items, and the views expressed in opinions, editorials, and commentaries are those of the writers only. Some news articles linked from this page may require a subscription or be behind a paywall.

NewsLinks

  • Map: These States Face a Shortage of Court Reporters

    Governing
    August 28, 2026

    According to recent analysis of industry trends, the number of court reporters in the U.S. has declined 21 percent over the last decade. Matt Riley, executive director of the American Association of Electronic Reporters and Transcribers, says this isn’t just a matter of a labor shortage, but “a growing constitutional crisis.”

  • Kern County murder verdict upheld as divided court rejects bias claim

    San Francisco Chronicle
    August 27, 2026

    A divided California Supreme Court upheld a Black man’s death sentence Thursday for raping and murdering a young white woman in Kern County, rejecting arguments by dissenting justices that the prosecutor engaged in racial discrimination by removing the only Black juror without stating his reasons.

    Related: Metropolitan News-Enterprise, Supreme Court of California - Opinion

  • Wrong Hearing Date in Notice Does Not Gut Sanction Award

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    August 28, 2026

    Div. Four of the First District Court of Appeal has affirmed an order imposing sanctions in the amount of $29,055 on a Palo Alto-area law firm and its founder for filing an amended complaint that asserts causes of action that were identical to those that were the subject of an earlier demurrer that was sustained without leave to amend, rejecting the view that the moving party’s inclusion of an incorrect date its notice of the request undermined the court’s jurisdiction.

  • C.A. Says Pro Pers Must Pay Sanctions for Fake AI-Generated Citations in Brief

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    August 28, 2026

    Div. Two of the Fourth District Court of Appeal yesterday declared that husband-and-wife appellants, who are in pro per, who relied on non-existent legal authorities and fabricated quotes must pay the respondents’ attorney fees on appeal, but bounced the case back to the trial court to determine the amount of the recompense.