Skip to main content
Judicial Branch of California branding Judicial Branch of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • Judicial Council
California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
    • All News
    • Chief Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • Courts of Appeal
    • Superior Courts
    • Judicial Council
  • Calendar
  • Multimedia
    • Media Contacts
    • Branch Facts
    • The CARE Act
    • Cameras in the Courtroom
    • Public Records Requests
    • Webcast Information
  • Plaintiffs Must Show Actual Harm Under California's License Plate Scanner Law, Appellate Court Holds

    The Recorder
    July 20, 2026

    (Subscription required) In a unanimous, published opinion, the Fourth District Court of Appeal panel concluded that plaintiffs do not have standing to sue under the Automated License Plate Recognition statute by alleging only a “subjective belief” a data collector invaded their privacy.

    Related: Metropolitan News-Enterprise

  • ‘Nonattorney’ used standing in the Filipino community to practice law illegally

    KTLA 5
    July 20, 2026

    Further investigation revealed that Alamarez presented himself as an attorney and encouraged clients to refer to him as such “for years,” while complaints and witness statements indicate that Alamarez’s clients from the Filipino community were operating under the belief that he was an attorney. Some were said to have known him as a pastor at their church, where he would recruit clients.

    Related: Bloomberg Law, State Bar of California, Metropolitan News-Enterprise

  • Voluntary Dismissal May Cause Forfeiture of Right to Appeal

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    July 17, 2026

    The California Supreme Court held yesterday that a pair of plaintiffs who filed a voluntary dismissal of their complaint after a trial judge sustained a demurrer, with leave to amend, as to some of their causes of action forfeited their right to appeal because the order at issue did not finally dispose of any of their claims.

  • D.A. Can’t Compel Mental Examination of Defendant Seeking Mental Health Diversion

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    July 17, 2026

    Two defendants in unrelated criminal proceedings, each seeking a mental health diversion, have persuaded Div. One of the Fourth District Court of Appeal that the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office does not have the right, under a discovery statute, to an order compelling a mental examination.

Pagination (100 pages of results found)

  • « First
  • ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 4 of 100
  • …
  • 100
  • ››
  • Last »

News and Features

  • Chief Justice
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • All News

Resources

  • Calendar
  • Public Records Request
  • Branch Facts

For Media

  • Media Contacts
  • Multimedia
  • Cameras in the Courtroom

Subscribe with your email address to receive news and updates

The email address is not made public. It will only be used if you need to be contacted about your account or for opted-in notifications.
CALIFORNIA COURTS NEWSROOM
Judicial Branch of California branding  for footer Judicial Branch of California
  • Access to Records
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
© 2026