Skip to main content
Judicial Branch of California branding Judicial Branch of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • Judicial Council
California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
    • All News
    • Chief Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • Courts of Appeal
    • Superior Courts
    • Judicial Council
  • Calendar
  • Multimedia
    • Media Contacts
    • Branch Facts
    • The CARE Act
    • Cameras in the Courtroom
    • Public Records Requests
    • Webcast Information
  • C.A. Says Kern D.A. Lacks Authority to Appeal Alameda Superior Court Resentencing Order

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    October 1, 2026

    Div. One of the First District Court of Appeal held yesterday that Kern County District Attorney Cynthia Zimmer lacks authority to appeal a resentencing order entered in Alameda Superior Court that resulted in the early release of a convicted killer where the local prosecutor in that jurisdiction and the Attorney General each declined to challenge the decision.

  • Paramount-Warner Bros. merger wins final court approval

    Daily Journal
    October 1, 2026

    (Subscription required) An Oakland federal judge approved Paramount Skydance's acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery over objections from advocacy groups, cementing a deal with 12 state attorneys general that requires no studio or cable-network divestitures.

    Related: Associated Press

  • Los Angeles court seeks attorneys to serve as temporary judges

    Daily Journal
    October 1, 2026

    (Subscription required) Attorneys who have been members of the State Bar of California for at least 10 years are eligible to apply. The deadline is Dec. 1.

  • Lyft to pay $272.5M in largest California settlement over worker classification

    San Francisco Chronicle
    October 1, 2026

    Ride-hailing giant Lyft agreed Thursday to pay $272.5 million to settle a lawsuit challenging its classification of drivers in California as contractors, rather than employees entitled to minimum wages, unemployment insurance and other benefits. But the settlement — most of which would be paid to drivers who worked for Lyft between April 2016 and December 2020 — doesn’t require Lyft to treat its current drivers as employees. 

    Related: The Recorder, CalMatters, Reuters, Courthouse News Service, Bloomberg Law, CBS News Sacramento, Law Commentary

Pagination (89 pages of results found)

  • « First
  • ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 4 of 89
  • …
  • 89
  • ››
  • Last »

News and Features

  • Chief Justice
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • All News

Resources

  • Calendar
  • Public Records Request
  • Branch Facts

For Media

  • Media Contacts
  • Multimedia
  • Cameras in the Courtroom

Subscribe with your email address to receive news and updates

The email address is not made public. It will only be used if you need to be contacted about your account or for opted-in notifications.
CALIFORNIA COURTS NEWSROOM
Judicial Branch of California branding  for footer Judicial Branch of California
  • Access to Records
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
© 2026