• California may restrict undercover police operations targeting youth

    CalMatters
    August 31, 2026

    The Legislature last week passed a bill that would prohibit law enforcement agencies from targeting certain people under age 26 in so-called Perkins operations, which involve undercover agents posing as incarcerated people to elicit incriminating information from suspects. Ten cases are lined up at the California Supreme Court in which people targeted in Perkins operations are challenging their convictions.

  • No Error in Awarding Support to Domestic-Violence Convict

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    August 31, 2026

    Div. Eight of this district’s Court of Appeal held Friday that a judge did not abuse her discretion in awarding spousal support to a woman who had previously been convicted of domestic violence against her then-husband despite the existence of a statutory presumption against such payments, rejecting the contention that the jurist conflated the factors applicable to the appropriateness of alimony in general with the analysis relevant to rebuttal.

  • C.A. Says Carjacker’s Gashed Head, Repeating Self, Not Enough for ‘Unconsciousness’ Defense

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    August 31, 2026

    Div. Eight of this district’s Court of Appeal has affirmed the conviction of a man who was accused of committing a carjacking that occurred just after he crashed his own vehicle into a freeway barrier, rejecting his contention that a judge erred in failing to instruct on an “unconsciousness” defense based on witness testimony indicating that the suspect had a gash to his head, was repeating himself, and had insisted the victim’s car was his own.

  • Financial Elder Abuse Does Not Require Economic Profit

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    August 31, 2026

    A wealth adviser who gambled with the portfolio of a client, now age 90, and caused assets to dwindle from a value of $2,616,421 in August 2019 to $475,099.23 in December 2020, can be held liable for financial elder abuse though he did not pocket any of the property, Div. One of this district’s Court of Appeal has declared in affirming a $6 million award plus three-quarters of a million dollars in attorney fees.