• Chief Justice Guerrero Announces 2026 Civic Learning Award Honorees

    California Courts Newsroom
    May 1, 2026

    Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero announced the recipients of the 2026 Civic Learning Awards, the state’s highest honor recognizing K–12 schools for outstanding achievement in civic education. One elementary school, one middle school, and one high school received the Civic Learning Award of Excellence, highlighting their exceptional programs that empower students to engage meaningfully in their communities and develop lifelong civic skills.

  • Bail must be ‘reasonably attainable’ for nonviolent offenders, California Supreme Court rules

    San Francisco Chronicle
    April 30, 2026

    People charged with crimes in California must be granted bail in amounts they can afford unless they are accused of capital offenses, or face serious charges and pose a threat of violence if released, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday. Lawyers said the decision could affect thousands of cases.

    Related: CalMatters, Metropolitan News-Enterprise, Davis Vanguard, Supreme Court of California - Opinion

  • Top California court upholds death penalty for Yosemite killer

    Courthouse News Service
    April 30, 2026

    Cary Anthony Stayner, 64, made a host of challenges in his appeal to the state’s high court. He claimed authorities violated his Miranda rights, that he faced coercive questioning from law enforcement, and that police had no probable cause to arrest him. Stayner also argued the trial court judge made errors ranging from jury selection to judicial bias.

    Related: Mariposa Gazette, Supreme Court of California - Opinion

  • Habeas Relief Wrongly Granted to Man Who Set Lady on Fire

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    April 30, 2026

    The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday reversed an order vacating the conviction and death sentence of a California man who admitted to raping a woman before setting her on fire, saying that District Court Judge Otis D. Wright II of the Central District of California wrongly found that the California Supreme Court acted unreasonably in rejecting the defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims in his state-court habeas corpus petition.