• Case Improperly Dismissed Based on Lawyer’s Misconduct

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    January 6, 2026

    A judge erred in issuing a terminating sanction based solely on dereliction of the plaintiff’s attorney, Div. Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal has held, pointing out that such an action is statutorily barred, and finding, impliedly, that a local rule of the Orange Superior Court authorizing the killing off of the lawsuit, under the circumstances, is partially invalid.

  • New presiding judge steps into role at San Diego Superior Court

    The San Diego Union-Tribune
    January 6, 2026

    Presiding Judge Michael Groch also takes the helm of California’s second-largest trial court system as it continues working through how best to implement Proposition 36, a year-old measure that toughened penalties for petty theft and drug possession for repeat offenders.

  • 9th Circuit revives California law banning forced outing of transgender students

    San Francisco Chronicle
    January 6, 2026

    A federal appeals court says a judge who ordered schools in California to let teachers inform parents that their child has identified as transgender misunderstood both the facts and the law. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez has been put on hold, but a conservative group says it’s planning an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Related: Los Angeles Times

  • Does AI belong in the exam room? Lawsuit alleges Sharp violated patient privacy.

    The San Diego Union-Tribune
    January 5, 2026

    A recent lawsuit filed in San Diego Superior Court alleges that Sharp HealthCare recorded conversations between doctors and their patients without written consent, using the information to document visits with an artificial intelligence program developed by a private company in Pittsburgh.