NewsLinks is a collection of recent news items relating primarily to the California judicial branch. NewsLinks does not verify or endorse the accuracy or fairness of the news items, and the views expressed in opinions, editorials, and commentaries are those of the writers only. Some news articles linked from this page may require a subscription or be behind a paywall.

NewsLinks

  • Judge Erred in Quashing Subpoena for ‘Disabled’ Victim

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    February 9, 2026

    Div. Two of the Fourth District Court of Appeal has held that a trial judge in a criminal proceeding erred in quashing a defense subpoena relating to the victim of an alleged kidnapping, who was purportedly taken by her fiancé from a conservator’s facility after being diagnosed with schizophrenia, based on a finding that a probate court order declaring her to be “gravely disabled” was dispositive of her incompetence to testify.

  • The law that built the internet and continues to test the courts

    Daily Journal
    February 6, 2026

    (Subscription required) Saturday marks 30 years since President Clinton signed the Communications Decency Act, creating Section 230's immunity shield for online platforms. Courts are still grappling with its limits in cases testing whether social media companies can be held liable for allegedly addictive algorithms. 

  • Meta must strip inactive accounts from usage metrics, judge rules

    Daily Journal
    February 6, 2026

    (Subscription required) U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter Kang ruled Meta inflated its defense in the social media addiction MDL by counting dormant accounts in average time-on-app figures. The company must reproduce the data with a far tighter margin of error, handing plaintiffs more precise metrics for damages and causation arguments.

  • Traffic delays can justify reopening in absentia orders, 9th Circuit rules

    Daily Journal
    February 6, 2026

    (Subscription required) The 9th Circuit en banc held immigration judges must conduct a case-specific inquiry into whether severe traffic can constitute "exceptional circumstances," overruling part of a 2021 precedent and remanding a family's removal case to the BIA.