Skip to main content
Judicial Branch of California branding Judicial Branch of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • Judicial Council
California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
    • All News
    • Chief Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • Courts of Appeal
    • Superior Courts
    • Judicial Council
  • Calendar
  • Multimedia
    • For Media Overview
      • COVID-19 and the Courts
      • Media Contacts
      • Cameras in the Courtroom
      • Public Records Requests
      • Supreme Court Oral Argument Archive
      • Branch Facts
      • Civic Learning Awards

Search results

News Release - March 4, 2016

Supreme Court Committee Provides Guidance to Judges on Attending Political Fundraising or Endorsement Events

The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) has adopted a formal advisory opinion providing guidance to judges and judicial candidates to assist them in determining the types of activities they may engage in...
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

Feature - March 30, 2016

Can a Presiding Judge Disqualify an Entire Bench?

Can a presiding judge disqualify an entire bench? The answer is a decisive “no”, according to the Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions, the ethical rule is that no judge may decide if another judge is disqualified. But they also gave...
Related:
Supreme Court Committees
CJEO Website
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

Feature - May 20, 2016

Public Comment Plays Unique Role in Judicial Ethics Opinions

Public comment helps the Supreme Court of California’s Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions draft advisory opinions on ethics issues of importance to California’s judges—it also helps them decide whether to publish an opinion or redraft based on the comments received.
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Judiciary
Image
CJEO Public Comment

News Release - June 20, 2016

Ms. Andrea Wallin-Rohmann Appointed Clerk/Administrator of the Third Appellate District

SACRAMENTO—Administrative Presiding Justice Vance Raye today announced the appointment of Ms. Andrea Wallin-Rohmann as the Clerk/Administrator of the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, effective August 1, 2016.
Related:
3rd District Court of Appeal
Administrative Presiding Justice Vance Raye
Third Appellate District
Image
3rd District Court of Appeals

Feature - July 7, 2016

When should a judge who is a former prosecutor be disqualified from a criminal proceeding?

Recent U.S. Supreme Court's Williams v. Pennsylvania case applies a disqualification standard for former prosecutors similar to earlier California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) advice—CJEO extends its advice to service in a prior conviction.
Related:
Disqualification for Prior Appearance as a Deputy District Attorney in Another …
CJEO Website
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Judiciary

News Release - November 22, 2016

Supreme Court Makes Appointments to Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

SAN FRANCISCO--The California Supreme Court today announced the reappointment of Justice Judith L. Haller of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District and Judge Michael T. Garcia (Ret.) of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and the appointment of Judge Samantha P. Jessner of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to fill a vacancy, to four-year terms on the Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions.
Related:
CJEO Website
Contact CJEO
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

Feature - November 30, 2016

Ethics Committee Advises Judge May Swear In New DA

The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) issued oral advice that a judge may administer the oath of office to a newly elected district attorney. CJEO Oral Advice Summary 2016-018 concludes that because judges are authorized by law to administer the oath of office that all public office holders are required to take under the California Constitution, doing so is an official function of judicial office.
Related:
CJEO Oral Advice Summary 2016-018
Committee Website
Committee Members
Oral Advice Summaries
Formal Opinions
Informal Opinion Summaries
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

Feature - December 13, 2016

Judges May No Longer Accept a Fee for Performing Marriages

The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) issued oral advice that judges must follow a new law prohibiting compensation for solemnizing a marriage--legislation effective January 1, 2017, changes the law.
Related:
Oral Advice Summary 2016-019
Committee Website
Committee Members
Oral Advice Summaries
Formal Opinions
Informal Opinion Summaries
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

News Release - February 27, 2017

Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, to Hear Oral Argument at Nevada Union High School

Sacramento—Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, will hear oral argument at Nevada Union High School in the Nevada Joint Union School District.
Related:
Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District
Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, to Hear Oral Argument at Pioneer Hig…
Third Appellate District
Image
Court of Appeal Third Appellate District (Sacramento)

News Release - April 19, 2017

Supreme Court Ethics Committee Advises Judges Against Investments in Marijuana Enterprises

SAN FRANCISCO—The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) has adopted a formal advisory opinion advising judges that maintaining any interest in an enterprise that involves medical or recreational marijuana is incompatible with the obligation to follow the law under California Code of Judicial Ethics.
Related:
CJEO Website
Members
Formal Opinions
Informal Opinions
Oral Advice
Contact CJEO
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Image
Judge Ken So

News Release - May 2, 2017

Supreme Court Ethics Committee Advises Judges Against Service on the Board of a Charter School

SAN FRANCISCO—The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) has adopted a formal advisory opinion advising judges against serving on a charter school board.
Related:
Formal Opinion 2017-011
CJEO Website
Members
Formal Opinions
Informal Opinions
Oral Advice
Contact CJEO
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Image
Justice Maria Rivera

News Release - July 26, 2017

Supreme Court Ethics Committee Recommends Precautions and Provides Guidance to Judges on Meeting with Vendors

SAN FRANCISCO—The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions has adopted a formal opinion providing advice and guidance to judges about procurement, and product and service research, meetings with vendors under the California Code of Judicial Ethics.
Related:
Formal Opinion 2017-009: Judges Meeting with Vendors
Public Comments
Committee Website
Contact CJEO
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

Pagination (4 pages of results found)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 1 of 4
  • Next ›
  • Last »

Summary

  • Reset filters
  • 47 results found
  • (-) Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
  • (-) California Supreme Court
  • (-) Courts of Appeal
  • (-) Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye

Sort by

  • Date Sort descending

Topics

  • Show all 53
  • Superior Courts 3
  • (-) California Supreme Court 37
  • (-) Courts of Appeal 10
  • (-) Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye 3

Tags

  • Show all 239
  • Chief Justice 87
  • California Supreme Court 61
  • Civics 30
  • Fourth Appellate District 25
  • (-) Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions 36

News and Features

  • Chief Justice
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • All News

Resources

  • Calendar
  • Public Records Request
  • Supreme Court Oral Argument Archive
  • Branch Facts

For Media

  • Media Contacts
  • Multimedia
  • Cameras in the Courtroom
  • COVID-19

Subscribe with your email address to receive news and updates

A valid email address. All emails from the system will be sent to this address. The email address is not made public and will only be used if you wish to receive a new password or wish to receive certain news or notifications by email.
CALIFORNIA COURTS NEWSROOM
Judicial Branch of California branding  for footer Judicial Branch of California
  • Access to Records
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
© 2023