• C.A. Imposes $3,000 Sanction for False Notice of Settlement, Other Breach of Duties

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    December 30, 2025

    Div. One of the Fourth District Court of Appeal yesterday imposed a $3,000 sanction on the Santa Monica law firm of Laurel Employment Law, APC based on it having advised the court that a settlement had been reached when it hadn’t been, causing a scheduled oral argument to be cancelled, not responding to an order to show cause re sanctions, and its two lawyers with knowledge of the matter failing to appear at the hearing.

  • Bail policy changes falter as courts resist individualized hearings

    Daily Journal
    December 29, 2025

    (Subscription required) Malcolm Vaughn sits in a Solano County jail cell, accused of attempted second degree robbery after he paid $2 for a $2.50 donut, then struggled with the shopkeeper's son and left without the cruller. Also charged with drug possession, he has been locked up since June. He's among the latest clients of Civil Rights Corps, a legal advocacy nonprofit that partners with public defenders' offices around California to file habeas corpus petitions on behalf of people in jail awaiting trial who remain detained solely because they are unable to pay bail.

  • California has sued Trump 52 times this year. Here’s what those suits have accomplished

    San Francisco Chronicle
    December 29, 2025

    With little prospect of fending off President Donald Trump’s agenda in Congress or at the ballot box, California has turned, once again, to the courts. With considerable success so far. In lawsuits filed or joined by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, federal judges have blocked the Trump administration’s freeze on virtually all domestic federal funding and mass layoffs in agencies such as the U.S. Department of Education and the AmeriCorps volunteer program.

  • C.A. Reverses Judgment Because Plaintiff Didn’t Contest on Appeal Assertion That It Is Void

    Metropolitan News-Enterprise
    December 29, 2025

    The Court of Appeal for this district has reversed an order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment on the ground that it is void, but did so without determining whether it actually was, as the defendant contended in the trial court, a nullity.