Skip to main content
Judicial Branch of California branding Judicial Branch of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • Judicial Council
California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom California Courts Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
    • All News
    • Chief Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • Courts of Appeal
    • Superior Courts
    • Judicial Council
  • Calendar
  • Multimedia
    • For Media Overview
      • COVID-19 and the Courts
      • Media Contacts
      • Cameras in the Courtroom
      • Public Records Requests
      • Supreme Court Oral Argument Archive
      • Branch Facts
      • Civic Learning Awards

Search results

event - September 9, 2021

Supreme Court Oral Arguments For September 9, 2021

(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here.

All opinions are now posted.

 

event - October 5, 2021

Supreme Court Oral Arguments for October 5, 2021

(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here.

 

 

event - November 3, 2021

Supreme Court Oral Arguments for November 3, 2021

(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here.

 

 

event - December 7, 2021

Supreme Court Oral Argument for December 7, 2021

(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here.

 

News Release - February 23, 2021

Committee Issues Advice to Judges: Campaign Contributions from Political Action Committees

A state Supreme Court committee issued an advisory opinion explaining when a judge may accept campaign contributions from a political action committee when the contribution includes funds from another political action committee organized and funded by court employees.
Related:
Expedited Opinions and Oral Advice Summaries
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Image
seal of the supreme court

News Release - March 3, 2021

Committee Issues Advice About Judicial Service on a Governmental Task Force

Supreme Court committee issues expedited guidance about a judge serving as a member of a governmental task force with a broad agenda.
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Image
seal of the supreme court

Feature - March 30, 2016

Can a Presiding Judge Disqualify an Entire Bench?

Can a presiding judge disqualify an entire bench? The answer is a decisive “no”, according to the Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions, the ethical rule is that no judge may decide if another judge is disqualified. But they also gave...
Related:
Supreme Court Committees
CJEO Website
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

News Release - July 22, 2020

Ethics Committee Advises Caution for Judges Attending Protests

A California Supreme Court committee today published guidance for judges who want to attend public demonstrations and rallies, citing a slate of ethical issues for judges to consider before participating.
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
California Supreme Court
Image
CJEO Logo

News Release - June 17, 2020

Committee Issues Advice About Appellate Justice Disqualification

The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) this month posted a summary of oral advice stating appellate justices should disqualify themselves from a case if they were removed by peremptory challenge while hearing the case as a trial judge.
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

News Release - June 4, 2020

Committee Issues Advice About Reimbursement of Judicial Expenses by a Party or Counsel

A judge can only be reimbursed for expenses incurred during official duties under policies, procedures, and rates approved by the Judicial Council.
Related:
CJEO: Frequently Asked Questions
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Image
cjeo oral advice

News Release - November 5, 2018

Committee Issues Campaigning Advice to Presiding Justices

Oral advice issued to a presiding justice seeking to solicit campaign endorsements on behalf of other justices facing retention elections.
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
Image
CJEO Oral Advice

News Release - October 4, 2018

Committee Advises on Communication Between Appellate and Superior Courts Regarding Attorney Misconduct

The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) advised that an appellate court justice cannot contact a superior court presiding judge regarding misconduct by a superior court research attorney related to a pending appellate matter.
Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions

Pagination (5 pages of results found)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1 of 5
  • Next ›
  • Last »

Summary

  • Reset filters
  • 52 results found
  • (-) Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions
  • (-) Supreme Court
  • (-) California Supreme Court

Sort by

  • Date

Topics

  • Show all 81
  • Courts of Appeal 16
  • Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye 13
  • (-) California Supreme Court 52

Content

  • News 45
  • Event 7

Tags

  • Show all 131
  • California Supreme Court 60
  • Bar Exam 10
  • State Bar 10
  • (-) Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions 37
  • (-) Supreme Court 14

News and Features

  • Chief Justice
  • Supreme Court
  • Courts of Appeal
  • Superior Courts
  • All News

Resources

  • Calendar
  • Public Records Request
  • Supreme Court Oral Argument Archive
  • Branch Facts

For Media

  • Media Contacts
  • Multimedia
  • Cameras in the Courtroom
  • COVID-19

Subscribe with your email address to receive news and updates

The email address is not made public. It will only be used if you need to be contacted about your account or for opted-in notifications.
CALIFORNIA COURTS NEWSROOM
Judicial Branch of California branding  for footer Judicial Branch of California
  • Access to Records
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
© 2023