BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event28062@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260406T160204Z
DTSTART:20210602T160000Z
DTEND:20210603T060000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Arguments for June 2, 2021
DESCRIPTION:(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here [1].
 /*All opinions are now posted.*/
  
 {"preview_thumbnail":"/sites/default/files/newsroom/styles/video_embed_wysiwyg_preview/public/video_thumbnails/2154.jpg?itok=V8tVl5s0","video_url":"https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2154?view_id=12&redirect=true","settings":{"responsive":1,"width":"854","height":"480","autoplay":0},"settings_summary":["Embedded
 Video (Responsive)."]}
  
 /*(6) */*/McHugh (Blakely) et al. v. Protective Life Insurance, S259215 [2]
 View Argument [3] | Opinion filed 8-30-21 [4]/*
 This case presents the following issues: (1) Do the provisions of Insurance
 Code sections 10113.71 and 10113.72 apply, in whole or in part, to life
 insurance policies in force as of January 1, 2013, regardless of the original
 date of issuance of those policies? (2) Did the lower courts in this case
 properly rely upon private opinions of Department of Insurance staff
 counsel?  (See Ins. Code, § 12921.9; Gov. Code, § 11340.5; /Heckart v. A-1
 Self Storage, Inc. /(2018) 4 Cal.5th 749.) 
 /*(7)  */*/People v. McDaniel (Don’te Lamont), [Automatic Appeal], S171393
 [5]
 View Argument [6] | Opinion filed 8-26-21 [7]/*
 This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.
 [1] https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_e8efa5c42789f6ae90eb101474e736df.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true
 [2] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2303834&amp;doc_no=S259215&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw3W1BVSSFdVExIQFA0UDxTJiBOTztSICAgCg%3D%3D
 [3] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2154?meta_id=62707
 [4] https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S259215.PDF
 [5] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1903071&amp;doc_no=S171393&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw3W1BVSSFdVENIQFw0UDxfJCJOSzNTQCAgCg%3D%3D
 [6] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2154?meta_id=62708
 [7] https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S171393M.PDF
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><span><span><span><span>(Click the play icon) To view with the case information,&nbsp;</span></span></span></span><a href="https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_e8efa5c42789f6ae90eb101474e736df.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true">visit here</a>.</p>
 <p><em><strong>All opinions are now posted.</strong></em></p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>{"preview_thumbnail":"/sites/default/files/newsroom/styles/video_embed_wysiwyg_preview/public/video_thumbnails/2154.jpg?itok=V8tVl5s0","video_url":"https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2154?view_id=12&amp;redirect=true","settings":{"responsive":1,"width":"854","height":"480","autoplay":0},"settings_summary":["Embedded Video (Responsive)."]}</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong>(6) </strong></em><b><i>McHugh (Blakely) et al. v. Protective Life Insurance, <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2303834&amp;doc_no=S259215&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw3W1BVSSFdVExIQFA0UDxTJiBOTztSICAgCg%3D%3D">S259215</a><br />
 <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2154?meta_id=62707">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S259215.PDF">Opinion filed 8-30-21</a></i></b></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><span><span><span>This case presents the following issues: (1) Do the provisions of Insurance Code sections 10113.71 and 10113.72 apply, in whole or in part, to life insurance policies in force as of January 1, 2013, regardless of the original date of issuance of those policies?&nbsp;(2) Did the lower courts in this case properly rely upon private opinions of Department of Insurance staff counsel?&nbsp; (See Ins. Code, § 12921.9; Gov. Code, § 11340.5; <i>Heckart v. A-1 Self Storage, Inc. </i>(2018) 4 Cal.5th 749.)&nbsp; </span></span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong>(7) &nbsp;</strong></em><b><i>People v. McDaniel (Don’te Lamont), [Automatic Appeal], <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1903071&amp;doc_no=S171393&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw3W1BVSSFdVENIQFw0UDxfJCJOSzNTQCAgCg%3D%3D">S171393</a><br />
 <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2154?meta_id=62708">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S171393M.PDF">Opinion filed 8-26-21</a></i></b></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span>This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.</span></span></p>
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR