BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event26310@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260920T020211Z
DTSTART:20210519T160000Z
DTEND:20210519T190000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Arguments for May 19, 2021
DESCRIPTION:To view with the case information, visit here [1]
 /*All opinions are now posted*/.
  
 {"preview_thumbnail":"/sites/default/files/newsroom/styles/video_embed_wysiwyg_preview/public/video_thumbnails/2120.jpg?itok=PU8OzpBG","video_url":"https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?view_id=12&redirect=true","settings":{"responsive":1,"width":"854","height":"480","autoplay":0},"settings_summary":["Embedded
 Video (Responsive)."]}
  
 /*(5) */*/People v. Lewis (Vince E.), S260598 [2]
 View Argument [3] | Opinion filed 7-26-21 [4]/*
 The court limited review to the following issues: & (1) May superior courts
 consider the record of conviction in determining whether a defendant has made
 a prima facie showing of eligibility for relief under Penal Code section
 1170.95?  (2) When does the right to appointed counsel arise under Penal
 Code section 1170.95, subdivision (c)?
 /*(6)  */*/Busker (John) v. Wabtec Corporation et al., S251135 [5]
 View Argument [6] | Opinion filed 8-16-21 [7]/*
 Request under rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court that this court
 decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the
 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  The question
 presented is:  “Does work installing electrical equipment on locomotives
 and rail cars (i.e., the ‘on-board work’ for Metrolink’s [Positive
 Train Control (PTC)] project) fall within the definition of ‘public
 works’ under California Labor Code § 1720, subdivision (a)(1), either (a)
 as constituting ‘construction’ or ‘installation’ under the statute or
 (b) as being integral to other work performed for the PTC project on the
 wayside (i.e., the ‘field installation work’)?”
 /*(7)  */*/Mendoza (Leopoldo Pena) et al. v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co.,
 Inc., et al., S253574 [8]
 View Argument [9] | Opinion filed 8-16-21 [10]/*
 Request under rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court that this court
 decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the
 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  The question
 presented is: “Is operating engineers’ offsite ‘mobilization work’
 —including the transportation to and from a public works site of roadwork
 grinding equipment —performed ‘in the execution of [a] public work’
 (Cal. Lab. Code, § 1772), such that it entitles workers to ‘not less than
 the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character
 in the locality in which the public work is performed’ pursuant to section
 1771 of the California Labor Code?”
 [1] https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_51a3b08a9ce896d4282d5856d7a24e6c.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true
 [2] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2311967&amp;doc_no=S260598&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw6WzBdSCM9XEpIMDg0UDxTJSJeUzNRMCAgCg%3D%3D
 [3] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?meta_id=62201
 [4] https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S260598.PDF
 [5] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2262355&amp;doc_no=S251135&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw6WzBdSCM9XElIUEg0UDxTJiJOQzlSICAgCg%3D%3D
 [6] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?meta_id=62202
 [7] https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S251135.PDF
 [8] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2276363&amp;doc_no=S253574&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw6WzBdSCM9WENIIEg0UDxTJiIuUz1SMCAgCg%3D%3D
 [9] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?meta_id=62203
 [10] https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S253574.PDF
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><span><span><span><span><span>To view with the case information,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_51a3b08a9ce896d4282d5856d7a24e6c.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true">visit here</a></span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><em><strong>All opinions are now posted</strong></em>.</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>{"preview_thumbnail":"/sites/default/files/newsroom/styles/video_embed_wysiwyg_preview/public/video_thumbnails/2120.jpg?itok=PU8OzpBG","video_url":"https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?view_id=12&amp;redirect=true","settings":{"responsive":1,"width":"854","height":"480","autoplay":0},"settings_summary":["Embedded Video (Responsive)."]}</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong>(5) </strong></em><b><i>People v. Lewis (Vince E.), <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2311967&amp;doc_no=S260598&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw6WzBdSCM9XEpIMDg0UDxTJSJeUzNRMCAgCg%3D%3D">S260598</a><br />
 <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?meta_id=62201">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S260598.PDF">Opinion filed 7-26-21</a></i></b></span></span></p>
 <p class="body"><span><span><span><span>The court limited review to the following issues: &amp; (1) May superior courts consider the record of conviction in determining whether a defendant has made a prima facie showing of </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span>eligibility for relief under Penal Code section 1170.95?&nbsp; (2) When does the right to appointed counsel arise under Penal Code section 1170.95, subdivision (c)?</span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong>(6)&nbsp; </strong></em><b><i><span>Busker (John) v. Wabtec Corporation et al., </span><a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2262355&amp;doc_no=S251135&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw6WzBdSCM9XElIUEg0UDxTJiJOQzlSICAgCg%3D%3D">S251135</a><br />
 <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?meta_id=62202">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S251135.PDF">Opinion filed 8-16-21</a></i></b></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><span><span>Request under rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. &nbsp;The question presented is: &nbsp;“Does work installing electrical equipment on locomotives and rail cars (i.e., the ‘on-board work’ for Metrolink’s [Positive Train Control (PTC)] project) fall within the definition of ‘public works’ under California Labor Code § 1720, subdivision (a)(1), either (a) as constituting ‘construction’ or ‘installation’ under the statute or (b) as being integral to other work performed for the PTC project on the wayside (i.e., the ‘field installation work’)?”</span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong>(7)&nbsp; </strong></em><b><i><span>Mendoza (Leopoldo Pena) et al. v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co., Inc., et al., </span><a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2276363&amp;doc_no=S253574&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkw6WzBdSCM9WENIIEg0UDxTJiIuUz1SMCAgCg%3D%3D">S253574</a><br />
 <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2120?meta_id=62203">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S253574.PDF">Opinion filed 8-16-21</a></i></b></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><span><span>Request under rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. &nbsp;The question presented is: “Is operating engineers’ offsite ‘mobilization work’ —including the transportation to and from a public works site of roadwork grinding equipment —performed ‘in the execution of [a] public work’ (Cal. Lab. Code, § 1772), such that it entitles workers to ‘not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed’ pursuant to section 1771 of the California Labor Code?”</span></span></span></span></p>
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR