BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event1172@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260417T031337Z
DTSTART:20201103T170000Z
DTEND:20201103T233000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Argument
DESCRIPTION:(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here [1].
 {"preview_thumbnail":"/sites/default/files/newsroom/styles/video_embed_wysiwyg_preview/public/video_thumbnails/1809.jpg?itok=2eKkm3sn","video_url":"https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?view_id=12&redirect=true","settings":{"responsive":1,"width":"854","height":"480","autoplay":0},"settings_summary":["Embedded
 Video (Responsive)."]}
 [1] https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_21256aa26e6e03670ed5b01f28cdb78c.pdf%26view%3D1&embedded=true
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, <a href="https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_21256aa26e6e03670ed5b01f28cdb78c.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true">visit here</a>.</p>
 <p>{"preview_thumbnail":"/sites/default/files/newsroom/styles/video_embed_wysiwyg_preview/public/video_thumbnails/1809.jpg?itok=2eKkm3sn","video_url":"https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?view_id=12&amp;redirect=true","settings":{"responsive":1,"width":"854","height":"480","autoplay":0},"settings_summary":["Embedded Video (Responsive)."]}</p>
LOCATION:<p><a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/calendars/SNOV320B.PDF">View Calendar</a></p>

<p><span><span><span><em><strong>(1)&nbsp; </strong></em><b><i>Vazquez (Gerardo) et al. v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2298558&amp;doc_no=S258191&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmXkg%2FW1BFSCNdUEhIMEA0UDxTJiBeQzNTICAgCg%3D%3D">S258191</a><br />
<a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?meta_id=55660">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S258191.PDF">Opinion filed 1-14-2021</a></i></b></span></span></span><br />
<span><span><span><span><span>Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., S258191.&nbsp; (9th Cir. No. 17-16096; 939 F.3d 1045; Northern District of California No. 3:16-cv-05961-WHA.)&nbsp; Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.&nbsp; The question presented is:&nbsp; Does the decision in <i>Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court</i> (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903, apply retroactively?</span></span></span></span></span></p>

<p><span><span><span><em><strong>(2)&nbsp;</strong></em> <b><i>In re Palmer II (William M.) on Habeas Corpus, <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2288147&amp;doc_no=S256149&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmXkg%2FW1BFSCNdUE9JQEg0UDxTJiM%2BQz5RICAgCg%3D%3D">S256149</a><br />
<a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?meta_id=55661">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S256149.PDF">Opinion filed 1-28-2021</a></i></b></span></span></span><br />
<span><span><span><span>#19-100&nbsp; In re Palmer, S256149.&nbsp; (A154269; 33 Cal.App.5th 1199; Riverside County Superior Court; CR29074.)&nbsp; Review on the court’s own motion after the Court of Appeal granted relief on a petition for writ of habeas corpus.&nbsp; The court limited review to the following issues:&nbsp; (1) Did this life prisoner’s continued confinement become constitutionally disproportionate under article I, section 17 of the California Constitution and/or the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution?&nbsp; (2) If this life prisoner’s continued confinement became constitutionally disproportionate, what is the proper remedy?&nbsp; </span></span></span></span></p>

<p><span><span><span><em><strong>(3)&nbsp; </strong></em><b><i>People v. Johnsen (Brian David), [Automatic Appeal], <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1772469&amp;doc_no=S040704&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmXkg%2FW1BFSCNdUE5JQFQ0UDxbJyJeWzpSMCAgCg%3D%3D">S040704</a><br />
<a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?meta_id=55662">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S040704.PDF">Opinion filed 2-1-2021</a></i></b></span></span></span><br />
<span><span>This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.</span></span></p>

<p><span><span><span><em><strong>(4)&nbsp;</strong></em> <b><i>People v. Ramirez (Irving Alexander), [Automatic Appeal], <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1886838&amp;doc_no=S155160&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmXkg%2FW1BFSCNdUExIUEg0UDxfJiNOQzxTMCAgCg%3D%3D">S155160</a><br />
<a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?meta_id=55665">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S155160M.PDF">Opinion filed 1-28-2021</a></i></b></span></span></span><br />
<span><span><span><span>This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.</span></span></span></span></p>

<p><span><span><span><em><strong>(5)&nbsp; </strong></em><b><i>People v. Baker (Paul Wesley), [Automatic Appeal], <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1901958&amp;doc_no=S170280&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmXkg%2FW1BFSCNdUExJUFA0UDxfJCJeTzJTMCAgCg%3D%3D">S170280</a><br />
<a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/1809?meta_id=55666">View Argument</a> | <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S170280.PDF">Opinion filed 2-1-2021</a></i></b></span></span></span><br />
<span><span>This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.</span></span></p>

END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR