https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/ en https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/judicial-council-approves-trial-court-funding-proposals Judicial Council Approves Trial Court Funding ProposalsCorren, Blaine Fri, 07/18/2025 - 13:40 News Release SAN FRANCISCO—The Judicial Council at its July 18 business meeting approved the allocation of funding to the courts provided in the fiscal year 2025-26 state budget, which includes money for court-appointed dependency counsel, continued implementation of the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, and other costs associated with trial court operations. “I want to express my appreciation for the commitment of Governor Newsom and the Legislature for maintaining critical judicial branch programs and services we need,” said Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero. “This includes support for language access, treatment court programs, court-appointed counsel, and court facility improvements to ensure our courthouses are safe and secure.” Watch In addition, the council approved 16 budget change proposals to the California Department of Finance for consideration in the fiscal year 2026–27 budget, which include increased funding for costs associated with the Racial Justice Act, judicial security, language access, new courthouse construction and maintenance, and other judicial branch priorities. The proposals included an additional one raised during the meeting, but that wasn’t contained in the original council report. That added proposal seeks funding for an updated workload study of court-appointed counsel that represent children and parents in juvenile dependency proceedings. Judge Ann Moorman, chair of the council’s Budget Committee, presented the additional proposal, saying it will help determine updated caseload standards and the level of funding needed to support the court-appointed counsel program. “I believe this proposal aligns with our shared commitment to provide vital services to these children and families and ensure a strong court-appointed juvenile dependency system in California.” Watch Finally, the council updated its policy by which funding is allocated to the trial courts so it equitably accounts for potential changes to the judicial branch budget, such as budget reductions and restorations. Watch New Guidance for Courts That Use Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools The council approved proposals that address local court policies on the use of generative artificial intelligence for court-related work by judicial officers or court staff. The proposed new rule and standard focus on accuracy, supervision, and transparency when judicial officers or staff are using generative AI tools. They also address privacy, bias, and security risks posed by these tools. Courts that do not prohibit the use of generative AI would be required to adopt a use policy by December 15. Watch Funding to Continue Upgrading Court TechnologyThe council allocated grant funding to specifically help courts expand their use of technology. The funding will support projects related to cyber/information security, remote proceedings, data analytics, AI, and modernizing court technology infrastructure. The council also heard about success stories from courts that have received previous grant funding for technology projects. Court leaders described projects that converted paper documents to electronic court records, increased access to digital evidence for judges and litigants, and ensured disaster recovery during unexpected server outages. “The technology modernization funding allows each court to identify particular needs of their communities,” said Judge Kyle Brodie, chair of the council’s Technology Committee. “When awarding the program funding, we emphasize the need to use technology to improve access to our courts.” Watch Other Items on Council Meeting Agenda: Court Interpreter Use Study: The council received the latest Language Need and Interpreter Use Study, which details interpreter usage in trials courts for fiscal years 2020–21 through 2023–24 and predicts future language need. California courts recorded more than 2.5 million interpretations during the study period, which included remote and telephonic interpretations. Courts continue to prioritize funding for interpreter services, recruitment efforts, and remote services to help serve the approximately 6.4 million limited-English-proficient individuals in the state. Watch Updated Plan for Court Construction: The council approved the Judicial Branch Five-Year Infrastructure Plan and nine capital-outlay budget change proposals for fiscal year 2026–27. The plan represents the funding needs for new courthouse construction, as well as renovations and additions to existing facilities. Grants to Improve Jury Service: The council allocated grant funding to courts to improve the management of jury service. Funding priorities include self-check-in kiosks, electronic charging stations, and interactive voice and web services. Grants to Expand Language Access: The council allocated grant funding to expand language access for court users. Funding priorities include multilingual signage, audio/visual systems, kiosks, and websites. The complete meeting agenda and council reports are posted to the California Courts Meeting Information Center—an archived webcast of today’s meeting will be posted to the center as soon as it is available. https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/right-be-judged-your-peers-made-possible-jurors Right to Be Judged by Your Peers Made Possible by JurorsCorren, Blaine Mon, 05/12/2025 - 16:05 Feature Every year in California: Roughly 10 million people are summoned for jury serviced, or 1 in 4 people statewide More than 4.5 million people complete jury service, either in-person, on call, or on standby Around 70% of prospective jurors who arrive in person complete their service in one day Nearly 100,000 people are sworn in as trial jurors   In 1998, the California Legislature designated the second full week in May to honor the contributions of citizens who devote their time and effort to "making the cherished right of trial by jury a reality and to raise awareness about their contribution to our courts." The Judicial Council of California and the state’s trial courts use Juror Appreciation Week to recognize the sacrifice people make in taking time away from their lives, families, and jobs to fulfill one of the most important duties in our democracy—serving as a juror in a court of law. Making the Jury System Better for JurorsIn addition to Juror Appreciation Week, the California courts show their appreciation for jurors all year round. Following are some recent statewide initiatives to improve jury service in California: Mileage Reimbursement Increase: New legislation allows jurors to claim the mileage reimbursement rate of $0.34 per mile for travel both to and from court, doubling the amount individuals can receive—the legislation also authorizes courts to partner with local public transit agencies for low-cost or no-cost roundtrip transportation during jury service.   Raising Juror Pay: A pilot program in seven superior courts to see if increases to juror pay improves juror diversity and participation, raised juror’s daily compensation from $15 per day to $100 per day, and increased the mileage reimbursement rate from $0.34 to $0.67 per mile roundtrip.   Using Zelle in Place of Paper Check: The Stanislaus Superior Court has been participating in a pilot project to test the feasibility of paying juror per dimes using an e-payment platform through Zelle— shortening the time for jurors to get paid at the conclusion of their service, as well as reducing administrative costs for the court.   On-Call Options for Jury Service: Courts continue to increase the use of telephone standby and on-call options for jury service—in many instances, individuals can check the night or even the week before to check if they will be asked to come to court in person.   Staggered Reporting Times: Courts now use staggered reporting times for jurors, such as 8:00am, 10:00am, 1:00pm, or 2:00pm—this system recognizes individual jurors' schedules and helps reduce the lines of people checking in for duty at once.   Jury Portals: Courts continue to improve their online jury portals where individuals can check dates of service, request postponements and excusals, and sign up for reminders—additional features include the ability to contact jury department staff with concerns, get information about court procedures, and obtain proof of jury service for employers.   New Juror Orientation Videos: Updated orientation videos shown to prospective jurors and available online, explain how the jury system works, what jurors can expect, and how implicit bias can affect the process—the videos have been downloaded more than 60,000 times and viewed in courts by more than 6,000,000 jurors. Additional Improvements to Jury Service Over the YearsFollowing are a few more ways California courts have made the civic right and obligation of jury service more convenient for its citizens: Model Juror Summons: All 58 superior courts in California reference the model summons to ensure their jury service summons is understandable.   One Day or One Trial Jury Service:  If not chosen for a jury panel after one day of service at the courthouse, a juror’s service is done for at least one year—if you are selected to serve on a jury, after the trial is over your service is also completed for at least a year or longer.   Plain Language Jury Instructions: Plain language civil and criminal jury instructions accurately convey the law using language that is understandable to jurors.   Additional Resources for Learning About Jury Service Jury Handbook Court and Community pamphlet on how to respond to your juror summons Guide to Jury Deliberations Jury Service Stress guide Information for Employers on benefits of continuing to pay employees during their jury service More information about jury service https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/2024-year-review-judicial-council-california 2024 Year in Review: Judicial Council of CaliforniaCorren, Blaine Tue, 12/17/2024 - 15:52 Feature In 2024, California’s Chief Justice, the Judicial Council, and the courts continued their efforts to improve court operations, enhance services, and expand access to the justice system for the public. The following are highlights of those efforts: Chief Justice Delivers 2024 State of the Judiciary AddressChief Justice Patricia Guerrero delivered her annual State of the Judiciary address to the California Legislature. In her remarks, she emphasized her goals for the judicial branch, which include accountability in the use of public resources, efficient caseflow management, and safeguarding the integrity of the court and judicial decision-making. She also affirmed the judicial branch’s commitment to enhancing access to justice for the people of California. Using technology as an example, she explained how the courts are helping to increase access through remote services and tools—including 24/7 e-filing, access to online records and research, self-help resources, and remote appearances. A recent Judicial Council report showed that approximately 150,000 remote civil proceedings are conducted statewide each month; and more than 90% of court users and 98% of court staff reported positive experiences.   Online Tool to Request Reductions to Traffic Tickets Goes StatewideThe MyCitations online tool allows low-income individuals with infraction violations to request a reduction in their fines and fees without going to the courthouse. Users can also request a payment plan, more time to pay, or community service. Launched in the first court in April 2019, the MyCitations tool was successfully implemented in all 58 counties before July 1, 2024. Since its launch, more than 183,000 litigants have submitted requests to reduce their fines, resulting in more than $65 million in reductions. Adding to the MyCitations tool’s functionality, a new Online Trial by Declaration module allows a defendant to contest eligible traffic citations by submitting a written statement and uploading evidence online.   Filling the Justice Gap: Expanding Services for People Without AttorneysThe statewide Pathways to Justice conference brought together members of the legal community to highlight services and tools to help court users in civil cases who can’t afford attorneys. Cosponsored by the Judicial Council of California, the State Bar of California, and the Legal Aid Association of California, conference attendees included nonprofit legal services providers, private bar pro bono volunteers, and staff from court departments and self-help centers. The conference highlighted a broad range of strategies used to expand access to the legal system, including technology, AI, childcare, pro bono work, lawyer referral services, and language access. It also offered training in areas like housing, family law, and domestic violence, in which parties are often without attorneys.   California Courts Launch CARE Act StatewideThis year all 58 trial courts in California began accepting petitions under the CARE Act, which authorizes specified people to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan that can include treatment, housing support, and other services for persons with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Per the CARE Act statute, implementation started in October 2023, with seven counties (Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, Tuolumne), and Los Angeles County followed two months later. The remaining 50 counties met the legislative deadline for accepting petitions by Dec. 2, 2024. Since the CARE Act took effect, the council has supported the rollout by: Creating new court rules and forms, as well as fact sheets, webinars, and videos to educate courts and the public about the CARE Act process   Meeting with courts and county stakeholders—including monthly office hours—to gauge progress, identify challenges, and provide technical assistance   Helping translate court documents and videos into other languages, including Spanish, Khmer, Tagalog, and Farsi   Collecting data on the program’s implementation, which it reports quarterly to the California Department of Health Care Services Statewide CARE Act data has shown the number of petitions filed each month has been relatively steady since its launch in the early implementing counties—with a total of 869 petitions filed from Oct. 1, 2023, through Oct. 31, 2024. During that same time, courts ordered more than 175 care agreements and plans, and 516 petitions were still being actively engaged.   Pilot Program to Address Court Interpreters ShortageA retiring workforce, geographic constraints, and testing capacity are making it difficult for courts to meet the demand for interpreting. To address the shortage of interpreters, the state’s judicial branch launched a five-year pilot program to hire more court interpreter employees, dedicating $6.8 million in funding made available from the 2023 Budget Act. The Court Interpreter Workforce Pilot Program reimburses participants for costs associated with their training, coursework, and up to three examination fees. Program graduates must also agree to work for the courts for at least three years after passing all the required exams and enroll with the Judicial Council as a court interpreter. Twenty superior courts are participating in the first cohort of the program and collectively received more than 1,000 applications. Each court may have up to 10 candidates per year. Applications for cohort 2 will open in spring 2025.   Courts Continue to Improve the Juror ExperienceRecognizing the integral role jurors play in our justice system, following are some recent judicial branch initiatives to improve jury service in California: Pilot program in seven trial courts to improve juror diversity and participation by increasing juror pay from $15 a day to $100 per day and the mileage reimbursement from $0.34 to $0.67 per mile roundtrip—the pilot will end by early 2026 or when the funding is exhausted, whichever comes first   Pilot project in Stanislaus County to test the feasibility of paying jurors electronically via Zelle to shorten the time for jurors to get paid at the conclusion of their service and reduce administrative costs for the court—the council’s Court Executives Advisory Committee will review the pilot findings and consider a statewide rollout   Continuing to increase the use of telephone standby and on-call options for jury service, where individuals can check the night, and sometimes the week before, whether they will be asked to come to court in person   Providing jurors brochures with mental health information and strategies to cope with any service-related stress they may experience In addition, the council recently approved simplifying the language used for the oaths administered to jurors and prospective jurors to ensure they fully understand the oaths before voir dire and prior to being seated for a jury trial.   Thousands of Volunteers Advocate for Children in CourtThe council approved $2.713 million in grants to help fund 45 CASA programs that help support children when they must move to new homes for their own protection. During this time of transition, judicial officers can appoint them a CASA (court appointed special advocate), a trained volunteer that advocates for children in juvenile court. CASA volunteers spend time with the child, monitor their needs, and provide child-focused recommendations on services and education based on the best interests of the child. Unlike other mentoring programs, CASAs serve as an officer of the court, trained on topics such as the impact of trauma on children, cultural competency, and dependency laws. More than 7,000 CASA volunteers serve approximately 11,000 children, donating 400,000 hours per year to help children, judges, and other professionals in the state’s juvenile courts. Despite this enormous impact, more CASAs are needed for the roughly 70,000 children in foster care.   25th Anniversary of Court Adoption and Permanency MonthMore than two decades of collaborative efforts among the Judicial Council, the superior courts, and partners in child welfare has achieved positive progress in improving adoption and permanency in California. Comparing data from 1999 and 2023, the number of children entering foster care for the first time decreased by 51%, and the number of children living apart from their families decreased by 58%. In addition, the council approved new court forms to simplify, clarify, and provide additional guidance for parents during the adoption process. The revised “How to Adopt a Child in California” form now clarifies the necessary steps to finalize distinct types of adoptions, including adoptions of children of Native American ancestry. The council also approved a new form specifically designed for stepparent adoptions. Court self-help center staff identified stepparent adoptions as the most common types for which they provide assistance and the ones having the most confusing processes for self-represented litigants.   New Courthouses Improve Safety, Service for Court UsersThe judicial branch completed new courthouses in Menifee (Riverside County) and Redding (Shasta County). The new buildings address overcrowding, security, and accessibility issues, and help consolidate and improve court services for their communities. Since assuming responsibility for court construction in 2002, the council has completed 35 new courthouses, and another 16 are underway in various stages. These include new court facilities in both large and small counties, as well as urban and rural areas across the state. California Improving Courthouse SustainabilitySustainability efforts employed at courthouses across the state continue to use green energy, reduce emissions, and improve waste management. The judicial branch has already achieved either gold or silver LEED certification by the U.S. Green Building Council for 21 courthouses across the state and has seven more certifications in progress. LEED certification is a third-party certification program and the nationally accepted benchmark for the design, construction, and operation of high-performance “green” buildings. Those “green” strategies include water conservation, solar panels, EV (electric vehicle) charger stations, and setting sustainability standards for courthouse construction. The latest California Trial Court Facilities Standards approved in September of this year target a 12% increase in water conservation and a 15% increase in energy efficiency—or more if budgets allow—for future new courthouse projects. Additional long-term goals include electrifying heating systems and increasing the use of renewable energy.   Chief Justice Creates Task Force on Use of Generative AI in the California CourtsThe judicial branch launched a new judicial branch task force to evaluate generative artificial intelligence (AI) for its potential benefits to courts and court users while mitigating risks to safeguard the public. Earlier this year, Chief Justice Guerrero asked Justice Mary Greenwood and Judge Arturo Castro to help identify the foundational questions the California court system must consider regarding the appropriate uses of AI. In response to their report, Chief Justice Guerrero announced the following next steps for the judicial branch: Create an AI task force to oversee the consideration and development of branch actions that address generative AI, such as rules of court, technology policies, educational programs, and legislative proposals   Work with Supreme Court ethics committees to develop guidance on how judicial officers should navigate ethical issues associated with generative AI   Provide education for judicial officers, court professionals, and council staff that focuses on the uses, benefits, and risks of generative AI   Cybersecurity for the Courts The judicial branch made strides in safeguarding the courts and their personnel against cyber threats. A key focus was education, highlighted by a series of interactive cybersecurity webinars that equipped judicial officers and judicial branch staff with critical knowledge to protect both institutional and personal digital assets. Topics included recognizing phishing attempts, securing devices, and mitigating risks. To reinforce these efforts, the branch conducted phishing exercises throughout the year, enabling staff to practice identifying and responding to simulated threats in real time. These exercises not only improved awareness but also strengthened the branch's overall defense mechanisms against cyberattacks. Additionally, the courts bolstered cybersecurity by expanding endpoint protection, ensuring devices are better equipped to detect, prevent, and respond to threats. Reduction to Court Budgets Impacts Service to the Public In addition to a $97 million reduction to the trial courts, the fiscal year 2024-25 state budget also called for a commensurate reduction of 7.95% to the state-level judiciary, which includes the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, Habeas Corpus Resource Center, and the Judicial Council. To help manage the reductions, many of the state's trial courts froze hiring, adopted furloughs, and reduced hours at their clerks’ offices and public counters. Despite the cutbacks, the courts are making every effort to minimize delays and preserve public access to justice. The Judicial Council also implemented proactive cost-saving measures, such as hiring freezes, reduced travel, and shifting meetings online. Court leaders continued outreach to their local legislators to educate them on the work of the courts, and to communicate the operational impacts the budget cuts are having on court services to the public.   California Continues Work to Diversify the BenchThe council surveys California justices and judges at the end of each year to get a snapshot of the demographics of the California bench—including gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. For the 18th straight year since tracking this data, the number of women and people of color on the bench has increased. Female judicial officers now constitute 41% of our judges. The number of Asian, Black, and Hispanic judges has doubled during that same time. Supporting the goal of “Access, Fairness, Diversity, and Inclusion,” the council’s diversity initiatives also include the Judicial Mentor Program, a statewide undertaking between the executive and judicial branches to develop and recruit qualified and diverse judicial applicants for the state’s appellate and superior courts. The appellate and superior courts have also started their own local mentor programs. The council also created an online toolkit called Pathways to Judicial Diversity. The toolkit has resources designed to help judges and courts reach out to diverse law students and attorneys and encourage them to pursue judicial careers.   Judicial Branch Continues to Expand Civic LearningThe Chief Justice's Power of Democracy Civic Learning Initiative continued to expand its reach into more California’s schools. The initiative’s Civic Learning Awards program encourages K-12 public schools to share how they promote opportunities for students inside the classroom and in their communities. The program has presented the Civic Learning Award 540 times to 343 schools in the last decade—21 elementary, middle, and high schools across California were recognized in 2024. Schools at the highest level, Award of Excellence, traditionally receive a visit from California Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, while judges from other courts present the awards of Distinction, Merit, and Honorable Mention.  The initiative’s Judges in the Classroom program enables teachers to invite judges to visit their classrooms (either in-person or virtual) and engage their classes in lessons on the U.S. Constitution, Rule of Law, Voting Rights, or Historical Milestones in the making of our democracy. In 2024, the Judges in the Classroom program engaged 30% more courts and schools than it did last year. Currently, 353 volunteer judges representing 32 counties around the state support the initiative. Last school year alone, the program reached more than 13,000 students.   Judicial Branch Honors Individuals for Outstanding Service The Judicial Council honored three recipients with its 2024 Distinguished Service Award, which recognizes people and organizations for their extraordinary leadership and contributions to the administration of justice in California. This year’s recipients—Justice William W. Bedsworth, Judge Terry B. Friedman (Ret.), and Court Executive Officer Melissa Fowler-Bradley—were honored for their work related to advocating for civility within the legal profession, improving the court system for families and children, and leading court-based innovations to better serve the public. Watch these videos to learn about all of this year's award recipients. Chief Justice Guerrero and the Judicial Council also honored the thousands of additional public servants of California's judicial branch the first week of May during Public Service Recognition Week. This video below, produced by the council, highlights six of California's dedicated public servants, who speak about why they choose to serve in the judicial branch. Overview of Judicial Council Programs and Services Under the leadership of the Chief Justice and in accordance with the California Constitution, the Judicial Council is responsible for ensuring the consistent, independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice. The council carries out this mission through the work of its advisory bodies and staff that help develop and implement the policies and solutions to the issues confronting the California court system. The council also provides direct programs and services in multiple areas to ensure the courts can maintain meaningful access to the justice system for the public. Examples of just some of those service areas include: Budget, accounting, procurement, and audits—including management, distribution, and reporting on billions of dollars in court funding each year   Human resources—including HR and payroll administration for the nearly 3,000 state justices, judges, and appellate court and judicial branch employees   Information technology—including oversight for the California Courts public website, which averages 75,000 visitors per month   Education and training for judges and court staff—including more than 150 courses, webinars, videos, and podcasts per year   Courthouse construction, management, and emergency planning and security—including management of approximately 450 court facilities encompassing more than 19.8 million square feet, and annually completing more than 1,700 facility modification projects and addressing roughly 115,000 building service work orders   Legal services—including the annual development of hundreds of new and amended court rules and forms, and providing counsel on thousands of legal matters and agreements for the courts each year   Legislative advocacy—including the annual tracking of nearly 1,000 bills and the submission of approximately 50 position letters   Public affairs—including answering more than 2,000 inquiries for information from media and the public each year More information on the Judicial Council ____________________________________________________________________ Stay connected in 2025 by subscribing to the California Courts Newsroom and Twitter/X feed. (See bottom of this page for links) https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/california-courts-celebrate-jurors California Courts Celebrate JurorsCorren, Blaine Tue, 05/21/2024 - 17:47 Feature In 1998, the California Legislature designated the second full week in May as Juror Appreciation Week to honor the sacrifices and contributions of citizens who uphold the right of trial by jury and to raise awareness about their contribution to the court system. “The very existence of juries and jury trials provides all of us one of the basic guarantees of access to impartial justice spelled out in our Constitution, our right to a trial where one can be heard and judged by their peers,” said Orange County Presiding Judge Maria Hernandez. “We deeply appreciate the sacrifices and contributions jurors make to our justice system.” During Juror Appreciation Week, many courts make an extra effort to recognize those fulfilling their jury service, such as: Alameda Superior Court: Jurors meet judges who will discuss the functions of the justice system and personally thank all who fulfilled their civic duty Humboldt Superior Court: Additional snacks and food, as well as jury-themed games and activities Imperial Superior Court: Welcome banner, certificates of appreciation, and snacks Sacramento Superior Court: Tote bag with a reusable water bottle, hand sanitizer, and a certificate of appreciation San Bernardino Superior Court: Certificates of appreciation, snacks, drinks, and word games San Francisco Superior Court: Lunch, cookies, and goodie bag San Mateo Superior Court: Festive banners and decorations, snack baskets, and word search and crossword puzzles Santa Clara Superior Court: New text/email notification service to communicate with jurors serving on trials at the courthouse Tulare Superior Court: Buttons, snacks, and refreshments _________________________________________________________Making the Jury System Better for Jurors In addition to Juror Appreciation Week, the California courts show their appreciation for jurors all year round. See some recent statewide initiatives to improve jury service in California. https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/right-be-judged-your-peers-not-possible-without-jurors Right to Be Judged by Your Peers Not Possible Without JurorsCorren, Blaine Mon, 05/13/2024 - 12:39 Feature Every year in California: Nearly 12 million people are summoned for jury service, or 1 in 4 people statewide More than 4.5 million people complete jury service, either in-person, on call, or standby Approximately 98,000 are sworn in as trial jurors   In 1998, the California Legislature designated the second full week in May to honor the sacrifices and contributions of citizens who devote their time and effort to "making the cherished right of trial by jury a reality and to raise awareness about their contribution to our courts." Juror Appreciation Week is one way the Judicial Council of California and the state’s trial courts shine a spotlight on these citizens for helping to bolster democracy by ensuring the justice system guarantees that right for everyone. Making the Jury System Better for JurorsIn addition to Juror Appreciation Week, the California courts show their appreciation for jurors all year round. Following are some recent statewide initiatives to improve jury service in California: Increased Juror Pay: Starting on or after July 1, seven superior courts will implement a pilot program to see if increases to juror pay improves juror diversity and participation. In those courts, the juror fee will increase from $15 a day to $100 per day and the mileage reimbursement will increase from $0.34 to $0.67 per mile roundtrip.   Speeding up Juror Payments: Stanislaus Superior Court is part of a pilot project to test the feasibility of paying jurors via Zelle. More than 150 participants have used this option in lieu of receiving a paper check, shortening the time for jurors to get paid at the conclusion of their service, and reducing administrative costs for the court.   On-Call Options for Jury Service: Courts continue to increase the use of telephone standby and on-call options for jury service. In many instances, individuals can check the night or even the week before whether they will be asked to come to court in person.   Jury Portals: Courts continue to improve their online jury portals where individuals can check dates of service, request postponements and excusals, and sign up for reminders. Additional features include the ability to contact jury department staff with concerns, get information about court procedures, and obtain proof of service for employers.   Expanding Number of Source Lists for Calling Jurors: To increase the size and diversity of jury pools, courts now use three source lists, supplementing those from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and local Registrar of Voters (ROV) with state tax filers newly obtained from the Franchise Tax Bureau (FTB). Additional Improvements to Jury Service Over the YearsFollowing are a few more ways California courts have made the civic right and obligation of jury service more convenient for its citizens: One Day or One Trial Jury Service: California has one-day or one-trial jury service. If not chosen for a jury panel after one day of service at the courthouse, a juror’s service is done for at least one year. If you are selected to serve on a jury, after the trial is over your service is also completed for at least a year and often longer. The majority of people who report for jury service serve for just one day.   Postponement Allowed: California courts allow summoned jurors to postpone jury duty at least once. Rule 2.1004 of the California Rules of Court states that if the request is made under penalty of perjury in writing and in accordance with the court's local procedure, the jury commissioner should not require the prospective juror to appear at court to make the request in person. Further postponements may be granted at the court's discretion.   Mileage Expenses Reimbursed: Jurors get reimbursed for mileage expenses both to and from court—and courts can partner with local public transit to provide low-cost or no-cost roundtrip transportation during jury service. Resources for Learning More About Jury Service Jury Handbook Court and Community pamphlet on how to respond to your juror summons Guide to Jury Deliberations Plain language jury instructions Jury Service Stress guide Better for Business pamphlet for employers on benefits of continuing to pay employees during their jury service More information about jury service https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/2023-year-review-judicial-council-california 2023 Year in Review: Judicial Council of CaliforniaCorren, Blaine Tue, 12/12/2023 - 15:40 Feature California’s new Chief Justice, the Judicial Council, and the courts continued to identify, refine, and enhance court operations and services to improve access to the justice system. The following are highlights of those efforts: New Chief Justice Prioritizes Access, Diversity, and Public ServiceChief Justice Patricia Guerrero was sworn into office on January 2, 2023, making history as the first Latina to serve as California’s Chief Justice. In her first State of the Judiciary address, and throughout her first year in office, Chief Justice Guerrero acknowledged her family’s sacrifices, the importance of her heritage, and her commitment to a more diverse and inclusive judicial branch. The Chief Justice also placed a high priority on accountability, public service, and providing high-quality services to court users. To meet these goals, she’s advocated for stable and reliable funding, additional judgeships for under-resourced courts, and increasing the ability of court users to conduct business online through remote technology and procedures employed during the pandemic. Sister Branches’ Continued Support for Judicial BranchThe fiscal year 2023-24 state budget included no cuts to court operational funding, which Chief Justice Guerrero called “a continued commitment by Governor Newsom and the Legislature to support the judicial branch with a sustainable budget, which is a cornerstone of our ability to provide access to justice for all Californians.” Funding for key priorities of the judicial branch included: An inflationary adjustment to account for increases in operational costs that helps keep courthouses open and accessible to the public   Implementation of new laws related to language access, racial justice, pretrial programs, firearm relinquishment, user-friendly court forms, and the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act   Courthouse construction and maintenance, including two new projects in Nevada and Santa Clara counties, and additional funding for previously approved projects in Monterey and San Bernardino counties   Backfill for declining revenues from civil fees and criminal fines and penalties   New Judgeships Authorized to Help Serve PublicBased on the Judicial Council’s 2022 Judicial Needs Assessment, 17 counties require additional judgeships, for a total of 98 new judicial positions in the state. In some counties, this judicial need is expected to widen due to continued, dramatic population growth. In response, the state Legislature passed and the Governor signed SB 75 in October, authorizing 26 new superior court judgeships subject to an appropriation by the Legislature. Making the Jury System Better for JurorsRecognizing the importance of the right to a trial by jury, following are recent initiatives to improve jury service in California: Legislation enabling jurors to get reimbursed for mileage expenses both to and from court—also authorizes courts to partner with local public transit to provide low-cost or no-cost roundtrip transportation (see Los Angeles court’s partnership)   Upcoming pilot program in seven superior courts to study the impact of increasing juror compensation on participation and representation among juries (see AB 1981)   E-payment pilot project in Stanislaus County to pay jurors faster and more conveniently, without the need for paper checks   Expanded access to online jury portals, where individuals can check dates of service, sign up for reminders, and request postponements and excusals (see example of jury portal)   Increased diversity of jury pools by using three source lists—Department of Motor Vehicles, local Registrar of Voters, and Franchise Tax Board—to summon people for jury service   Produced in collaboration with the California Judges Association, a newly adapted video on understanding the challenges of implicit bias that serves as a guide and a tool for jurors to identify whether they may have a preconception that would impact their ability to serve Remote Proceedings and Services Stay Popular With Court UsersThe Judicial Council in November received the final report from the Ad Hoc Workgroup on Post-Pandemic Initiatives that included recommendations to continue practices adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic that increased access to justice for court users and the public. The workgroup identified successful remote practices and received input from court users, judicial officers, court staff, legal aid representatives, and criminal and civil attorneys. The report highlighted the workgroup’s efforts and recommendations outlined in its interim reports, which included: Expansion of remote access on a permanent basis for most proceedings   Consideration of conducting juror questionnaires, hardship forms, and selection online   Recommendations on case and proceeding types to conduct remotely, protocols for ensuring court users fully understand their options, and statewide guidelines to ensure court users receive the best possible levels of service and access The council continues to work with the Legislature to maintain remote options for court users, ultimately negotiating an extension of authority for courts to hold proceedings remotely in criminal cases through Jan. 1, 2025—and in general civil, civil commitment, and juvenile justice proceedings through Jan. 1, 2026. Helping Drivers Struggling with Traffic FeesThe MyCitations ability-to-pay program is an online tool where people can look up their traffic citation, answer questions about their income level, and submit a request to the court for a fee reduction. Users can also request a payment plan, more time to pay, or community service. Launched in 2019 in just a few courts, 38 superior courts now offer the MyCitations tool—the remaining 20 courts are scheduled to adopt it by June 30, 2024. Statewide as of December 1, 2023: Number of users/requesters: 86,851   Number of requests: 122,027   Total original amount due on all requests: $68,863,445   Total amount forgiven by courts: $45,180,608   Positive Impact of Pretrial ProgramsPretrial programs aim to increase the safe and efficient release of arrestees before trial, using the least restrictive monitoring practices possible while still protecting public safety and ensuring court appearances. A study released this year of California’s pretrial pilot program tracked more than 422,000 defendants awaiting trial in 17 superior courts. The study showed: Pretrial programs increased the release of people facing misdemeanors by 5.7% and by 8.8% for those arrested for felonies   Pretrial programs decreased the likelihood of rearrest for people awaiting trial by 5.8% for those booked on misdemeanors and by 2.4% for those booked on felonies While the pilot programs increased pretrial releases across the board, positive effects were especially large for certain people of color. Before program implementation, Black and Hispanic defendants booked on misdemeanors were 1.2% less likely to be released pretrial compared to White defendants booked on similar charges. After program implementation, Black defendants were 3% more likely to be released compared to White defendants, while Hispanic defendants had no significant difference in pretrial release rates compared to White defendants booked on similar charges. The state budget now provides ongoing funding to implement pretrial release programs statewide. Courts Making Data-Informed DecisionsA statewide data analytics summit convened more than 200 court professionals from 42 courts to share best practices for using data to support changes to their processes, which not only improved their internal operations, but improved the experience for court users. Courts sharing their data-informed strategies included: Los Angeles: the court designated specific courtrooms to hear domestic violence restraining orders to better streamline its family court calendars   Monterey: the court changed when it heard certain case types to help ensure interpreters are available   Santa Barbara: the court became more efficient in how many people it calls for jury duty each day   Courts Help Implement CARE ActEnacted this year, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act authorizes specific adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan, which includes treatment, housing support, and other services for persons with untreated schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. Per the legislation, seven counties (Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, Tuolumne) started CARE Act implementation Oct. 1. Los Angeles County implemented the act on Dec. 1, and the remaining 50 counties must implement it by Dec. 1, 2024. The Judicial Council helped courts prepare to put the legislation into practice by approving new court rules and forms and creating fact sheets, webinars, and videos to educate courts and the public about the CARE Act process. El Centro Courthouse Courthouse Construction Projects Improve Safety, ServiceThe state budget this year included funding to build critically needed new courthouses that will improve court operations and services to the public, including two new projects in Nevada and Santa Clara counties, and additional funding for previously approved projects in Monterey and San Bernardino counties. Overall, 19 projects are in various stages, ranging from site acquisition to design to construction. This year, the branch completed a new courthouse in El Centro and a renovation in Willows. Since assuming responsibility for court construction in 2002, the council has completed 34 new courthouses. Courts Prepare for Rise in Climate and Water Law CasesAs our climate continues to change, legal and policy experts expect a corresponding increase in the number of climate and water-related lawsuits and other regulatory issues coming before the courts. This year, a group of California judicial officers and court staff attorneys came together for the Judicial Council’s first Environmental Summit, where attendees heard the current science on climate change, the potential impacts on the public, and the expected lawsuits and disagreements courts will help to resolve. The council also expanded training for courts on climate change and water law, including in-person courses, videos, podcasts, and publications on environmental law topics. Judicial Branch Celebrates First Juneteenth State HolidayOn June 19, the judicial branch joined Californians in celebrating Juneteenth as a state holiday for the first time. The Judicial Council supported the bill, which commemorates the end of slavery in the United States. Said California Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero: “This year, our judicial branch honors this monumental day in our history, reminding us of the long struggle to freedom for Black Americans. To honor that struggle and our commitment to equal treatment under the law, we reaffirm access, fairness, diversity, and inclusion as foundational goals for our court system. We celebrate California’s diversity as a strength and our progress toward a court system that is more diverse and reflective of the communities we serve.” Judges in the Classroom Helping to Revive Civics EducationAs part of the Chief Justice’s Civic Learning Initiative, the Judges in the Classroom program continues to match judges with schools for in-person or remote visits with students. The visits help students understand the legal system, promote civic engagement, and highlight careers in the law. Statewide, the Judges in the Classroom program now has 213 volunteer judges from 32 counties. The superior courts in San Diego and Santa Clara counties collectively received more than 140 requests from teachers seeking in-person visits for Constitution Month in September. And in Orange County, of the 14 classrooms lined up to receive visits during Constitution Month, nearly all of them reported the lesson was the first time their students learned about the three branches of government. Judicial Branch Honors Individuals for Outstanding ServiceThe Judicial Council honored two recipients with its 2023 Distinguished Service Award, which recognizes people and organizations for their extraordinary leadership and contributions to the administration of justice in California. This year’s recipients—Presiding Justice Lee Smalley Edmon and Justice Marsha Slough (Ret.)—were honored for their work related to improving judicial diversity, leading courts through the COVID-19 pandemic, driving court-based innovations to better serve the public, and helping to shape a stable funding system for the state’s judicial branch. In addition, Judge Mark Juhas received the 2023 Aranda Access to Justice Award, which honors a judge’s commitment to improving and promoting fairness and access to the courts, especially for low- and moderate-income Californians. The California Lawyers Association presents the award in partnership with the Judicial Council and California Judges Association, and in association with the California Commission on Access to Justice. Watch these videos to learn about this year's award recipients New Judicial Council Administrative Director In September, the council unanimously voted to select Shelley Curran as the Judicial Council’s next Administrative Director. Curran will assume the role Jan. 1, following the retirement of Acting Administrative Director Millicent Tidwell. Curran is the first woman and first openly LGBTQ+ person to hold the permanent leadership role at the council. Curran, the council’s chief policy and research officer, has served the council since 2009. During that time, she has been a key player in advancing major policy issues for the judicial branch that include remote court proceedings, pretrial detention, evidence-based practices in sentencing, recidivism reduction, ability-to-pay determinations for fines and fees, and the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act. ____________________________________________________________________ Stay connected in 2023 by subscribing to the California Courts Newsroom and Twitter/X feed. (See bottom of this page for links) https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/jury-service-and-fairness-understanding-challenges-implicit-bias Jury Service and Fairness: Understanding the Challenges of Implicit BiasKaren.Datangel Tue, 12/05/2023 - 17:15 Feature     The Judicial Council announces the release of a 10-minute educational video, Jury Service and Fairness: Understanding the Challenges of Implicit Bias. The production aligns with recommended best practices for removing barriers to access and fairness, including: Implicit bias, also known as unconscious bias, can impact the way people interpret and process information without ever intending to—or even realizing it. Implicit bias can also cause people to hold assumptions or form stereotypes, which can influence their thoughts and decisions.  > Jurors bear the responsibility of evaluating evidence, assessing the credibility of witnesses, and applying these facts alongside the law to reach a verdict in thousands of criminal and civil cases each year.  “Everyone has a right to a trial by jury of their peers,” California Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero says in the video. She advises jurors, “Because your role is so important, we believe it’s vital to provide you with this information about implicit bias so that you can discharge your duty as a juror fairly and impartially, ensuring that any assumptions, stereotypes, and preconceptions do not influence your decision.” Jury Service and Fairness: Understanding the Challenges of Implicit Bias was originally developed by the non-profit Perception Institute in 2021 and was adapted by the Judicial Council in partnership with the California Judges Association. In addition to the new video on implicit bias, the council also updated California’s juror orientation video Justice For All: Orientation to Jury Service, which includes a new introduction and closing remarks by Chief Justice Guerrero. Both videos align with the Strategic Plan for California's Judicial Branch and will be shown by trial courts to the approximately 9 million jurors called for service every year.  In September 2020, the Work Group on the Prevention of Discrimination and Harassment, and with input from other Judicial Council advisory bodies, the Judicial Council's Center for Judicial Education and Research (CJER) Advisory Committee proposed amending rule 10.469 of the California Rules of Court. The amendment supported making education on unconscious bias mandatory for judicial officers. The Judicial Council approved the recommendation, effective January 1, 2022. (Watch)   https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/jurors-ensure-fundamental-right-be-judged-your-peers Jurors Ensure Fundamental Right to Be Judged by Your PeersCorren, Blaine Mon, 05/08/2023 - 13:15 Feature Each year, millions of Californians serve their communities and uphold the fundamental American ideal of the right to a trial by jury. Juror Appreciation Week is one way the California courts thank these citizens for fulfilling their obligation and ensuring the justice system guarantees that right for everyone. Making the Jury System Better for JurorsFollowing are some recent initiatives to improve the jury system in California: Recent legislation enables jurors to get reimbursed for mileage expenses both to and from court—the legislation also authorizes courts to partner with local public transit to provide low-cost or no-cost roundtrip transportation during jury service (see Los Angeles court’s partnership)   Courts are increasing their use of telephone standby and on-call options for people called for jury service—often individuals can check the night before, or even the week before, to check if they need to come to court in person.   Courts have expanded access to online jury portals, where individuals can check dates of service, sign up for reminders, and request postponements and excusals—some portals even allow users to contact jury department staff with concerns, get information about court procedures, and obtain proof of service for employers. (see example of jury portal)   To increase the diversity of jury pools, courts are now using three source lists—Department of Motor Vehicles, local Registrar of Voters, and Franchise Tax Bureau—to summon people for jury service   An updated juror orientation video with an accompanying video vignette shows potential jurors what to expect, includes new information on best practices in jury operations, and highlights the importance of a diverse jury pool (see orientation video) Additional Improvements to Jury Service Over the YearsFollowing are a few more ways California courts have made the civic right and obligation of jury service more convenient for its citizens: One Day or One Trial Jury Service: California has one-day or one-trial jury service. If not chosen for a jury panel after one day of service at the courthouse, a juror’s service is done for at least one year. If you are selected to serve on a jury, after the trial is over your service is also completed for at least a year and often longer. In fact, the majority of people who report for jury service serve for just one day.   Postponement Allowed: California courts allow summoned jurors to postpone jury duty at least once. Rule 2.1004 of the California Rules of Court states that if the request is made under penalty of perjury in writing and in accordance with the court's local procedure, the jury commissioner should not require the prospective juror to appear at court to make the request in person. Further postponements may be granted at the court's discretion.   Plain-Language Jury Instructions: The Judicial Council created legally accurate plain-language jury instructions that are readily understood by the average juror. The council’s advisory committees on jury instructions regularly review new case law and statutes and make recommendations to the council for updating the instructions. Use of the new jury instructions is “strongly encouraged” and are recommended unless a judge “finds that a different instruction would more accurately state the law and be understood by jurors.”   Raising Juror Pay: The Superior Court of San Francisco County is piloting a program created by state legislation to increase the diversity of jurors able to serve by raising juror pay to $100 per day for low- and middle-income individuals.  Juror Appreciation WeekIn 1998, the California Legislature designated the second full week in May to honor the sacrifices and contributions of citizens who devote their time and effort to "making the cherished right of trial by jury a reality and to raise awareness about their contribution to our courts." More information on Juror Appreciation Week https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/jurors-play-key-role-justice-system Jurors Play Key Role in Justice SystemCorren, Blaine Mon, 05/09/2022 - 07:56 Feature Each year, millions of Californians serve their communities and put into practice a fundamental American ideal of justice: the right to trial by jury. Juror Appreciation Week is one way the California courts thank these citizens for fulfilling their obligation and making the justice system work. Recent Efforts to Improve the Jury SystemFollowing are a few current initiatives to improve the jury system in California: Improving the Juror Experience: A new interim report from a judicial branch pandemic initiatives workgroup recommends expanding the number and diversity of people able to fulfill jury service by increasing juror pay, adjusting reporting times, and providing remote options for portions of jury service.   Reforming Jury Selection: The California Supreme Court named a Jury Selection Work Group to study whether modifications or additional measures are needed to guard against impermissible discrimination in jury selection.   Public Transit for Jurors: The Judicial Council has sponsored AB 1981, proposed legislation that would expand access to affordable public transit for jurors, as well as study statewide impacts on diversity and participation in jury service by increasing juror compensation.   California’s official jury orientation video provides an overview of the juror experience, including the jury selection process, the trial, jury deliberations, and the verdict. An accompanying vignette explores the history of jury service through to the present day as our juries have become a more diverse and inclusive part of our court system.   Additional Improvements to Jury ServiceFollowing are a few more ways California courts have made the civic right and obligation of jury service more convenient for its citizens: One Day or One Trial Jury Service: California has one-day or one-trial jury service. If not chosen for a jury panel after one day of service at the courthouse, a juror’s service is done for at least one year. If you are selected to serve on a jury, after the trial is over your service is also completed for at least a year and often longer. In fact, the majority of people who report for jury service serve for just one day.   Postponement Allowed: California courts allow summoned jurors to postpone jury duty at least once. Rule 2.1004 of the California Rules of Court states that as long as the request is made under penalty of perjury in writing and in accordance with the court's local procedure, the jury commissioner should not require the prospective juror to appear at court to make the request in person. Further postponements may be granted at the court's discretion.   Plain-Language Jury Instructions: The Judicial Council created legally accurate plain-language jury instructions that are readily understood by the average juror. The council’s advisory committees on jury instructions regularly review new case law and statutes and make recommendations to the council for updating the instructions. Use of the new jury instructions is “strongly encouraged” and are recommended unless a judge “finds that a different instruction would more accurately state the law and be understood by jurors.”   Raising Juror Pay: The Superior Court of San Francisco County is piloting a program created by state legislation to increase the diversity of jurors able to serve by raising juror pay to $100 per day for low- and middle-income individuals.  In addition, many courts have added new technologies to streamline jury service, such as check-in kiosks, online and phone check-in, and updates via text message. Juror Appreciation WeekIn 1998, the California Legislature designated the second full week in May to honor the sacrifices and contributions of citizens who devote their time and effort to "making the cherished right of trial by jury a reality and to raise awareness about their contribution to our courts."  https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/report-cites-ways-help-increase-diversity-jurors Report Cites Ways to Help Increase the Diversity of JurorsCorren, Blaine Wed, 03/23/2022 - 12:08 News Release Feature A new interim report from a judicial branch pandemic workgroup recommends expanding the number and diversity of people able to fulfill jury service by increasing juror pay, adjusting reporting times, and providing remote options. “One of the silver linings emerging from the trial courts’ response to the pandemic is looking with fresh eyes at ways to improve the juror experience,” said Justice Marsha Slough, chair of the pandemic workgroup. “We’ve been able to reimagine ways for people to participate in jury duty that might not have been thought possible a few years ago. Providing Californians with opportunities to participate online helps clear obstacles and enables them to participate in the fundamental civic responsibility of jury duty.” In crafting its recommendations, Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye’s Ad Hoc Workgroup on Post-Pandemic Initiatives heard from judicial officers, court executives, criminal and civil attorneys, and court staff. The workgroup asked these groups to comment on juror selection practices adopted during the pandemic via changes in jury management and operations, while maintaining the health and safety of court users, judicial officers, staff, and particularly prospective and sworn jurors. Based on those comments, the workgroup report recommends to:  Raise juror pay and travel reimbursement to reduce financial hardships and improve options for getting to the courthouse   Allow jurors to complete juror questionnaires and hardship forms online before being required to physically appear in court for voir dire   Stagger jury service appearance times with varying panel sizes in order to maximize efficiency for court staff and the summoned jurors   Develop tools for courts to conduct voir dire remotely, which helps streamline the juror selection process and gather information related to for-cause and peremptory challenges   We’ve been able to reimagine ways for people to participate in jury duty that might not have been thought possible a few years ago. — Justice Marsha Slough Pandemic Makes Fulfilling Jury Service Even Tougher The workgroup’s report notes the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted many new and existing barriers to jury service, especially for low-income and unhoused individuals, communities of color, seniors, the disabled, parents of young children, those without access to reasonable transportation, and other vulnerable, underserved, or underrepresented populations. The workgroup explains its recommendations could help expand access to jury service and increase the diversity of jurors able to serve, resulting in better jury deliberations, fewer hung juries, and greater public confidence in the justice system. Next Steps The pandemic workgroup will coordinate its efforts to improve juror systems with the Judicial Council’s recently established Jury Administration and Management subcommittee, which consists of members from the council’s Court Executives Advisory Committee. The subcommittee will review jury operations, identify best practices, and make recommendations on potential reforms and other post-pandemic issues.